Politics
August 5, 2025
Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump.
Right-wing activists have long warned of the coming federal invasion. Where are they now that it’s happened?
In a nation once praised for its democratic values and constitutional freedoms, the recent political climate has grown increasingly complex and divisive. The title, "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump," captures the profound transformation seen among many right-wing groups in America. Until recently, these militias held the U.S. Constitution as sacred. Now, in the wake of Donald Trump's increasingly authoritarian influence in 2025, we must ask: where are these constitutional defenders now?
For decades, right-wing activists in America have warned of a looming federal invasion. These far-right militias, often comprised of ex-military, libertarian sympathisers, and radical conservatives, believed in armed resistance against tyranny. Their loyalty lay with what they perceived to be the original intent of the Founding Fathers. The phrase "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump" underlines a contradiction that many Americans are now struggling to understand.The rise of Trumpism in 2025 has brought with it more than just political turbulence. Trump's controversial policies, executive overreach, and aggressive stance towards dissent have ushered in a period many would argue fits the very definition of the "federal invasion" these groups had long prophesied. And yet, the silence from the far-right militias is deafening. "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump" is not just a title—it's a revelation.
Under Trump's third-term campaign push, bolstered by a Supreme Court decision that many constitutional scholars have condemned, federal authority has expanded at an alarming rate. The National Guard has been deployed to suppress peaceful protests in several states. Political opponents have been harassed or silenced. What many thought would be an impossible overreach is now reality. This only strengthens the irony in the phrase, "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump."
Historically, groups like the Oath Keepers and Three Percenters positioned themselves as staunch protectors of constitutional liberty. Their rhetoric centred on defending citizens against what they deemed government overreach. Yet in 2025, as Trump tightens his grip on federal power, many of these groups have either aligned themselves with his regime or quietly faded from the public eye. The keyword, "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump," serves as a reminder of their ideological betrayal.
This sudden shift raises critical questions. Were these militias ever truly about the Constitution, or were they driven by identity politics and authoritarian impulses of their own? The current administration’s blatant attacks on judicial independence and press freedom have barely elicited a response from those who once claimed to be watchdogs of liberty. The blog title, "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump," illustrates this stark dissonance.
It appears many far-right activists now rationalise Trump's authoritarianism as necessary to "save America" from perceived enemies—immigrants, liberals, minorities, and progressives. This marks a transformation from principled resistance to partisan loyalty. "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump" reminds readers that constitutional devotion has, for some, become conditional.
The role of conservative media cannot be understated. Outlets that once promoted anti-government militias as freedom fighters have now become mouthpieces for Trump's federal agenda. This ideological realignment ensures that these groups are no longer watchdogs, but rather lapdogs. Again, the blog post’s repeating keyword, "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump," encapsulates the gravity of this political transformation.
Furthermore, the social media echo chambers of 2025 have amplified Trump’s propaganda while silencing dissenting voices. Algorithms have created bubbles where facts are malleable, and constitutional values are selectively applied. As the federal government oversteps its bounds under Trump's command, the far-right militias remain curiously inactive. "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump" seems to be a fitting description of this eerie complacency.
This poses real dangers for the future of American democracy. If groups once committed to protecting the Constitution now prioritise political loyalty, who will defend civil liberties when they are truly under threat? This is the haunting question that echoes through the phrase, "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump."
Even more alarming is the growing number of state officials openly supporting Trump's extreme federal policies, with some Republican governors pledging their loyalty over the Constitution itself. State sovereignty, once championed by these militias, is now routinely sacrificed in favour of centralised Trumpian authority. The phrase, "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump," represents not just a political turn, but a moral collapse.
This ideological betrayal has not gone unnoticed by all. Former militia members and constitutional scholars have come forward, decrying the hypocrisy. Some have formed new coalitions aimed at re-establishing true constitutional oversight and separating patriotism from partisanship. Their rallying cry? You guessed it: "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump."
At the grassroots level, a new movement is forming—one that seeks to reclaim the Constitution from those who once claimed to defend it. Composed of independents, moderates, disillusioned conservatives, and traditional liberals, this coalition aims to restore the balance of power. Their mission is to remind the country that the Constitution is not a partisan weapon, but a foundational document. "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump" becomes not only a statement of failure but a call to action.
The 2025 political landscape has proven that allegiance to individuals over institutions is a dangerous game. When right-wing militias chose Trump over the Constitution, they did more than betray their ideals—they endangered the very freedoms they swore to uphold. "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump" is a phrase that historians may well use to mark the turning point in America’s democratic decline.
In conclusion, the blog title "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump" encapsulates a profound and troubling evolution in the American political fabric. It serves as a stark reminder of how quickly principled movements can be co-opted when power becomes the ultimate goal. As the nation stands at this crossroads, the time to ask hard questions and demand accountability is now. For if those who swore to defend the Constitution no longer recognise its authority, who will protect it from further erosion?
The silence of the far-right in the face of Trump’s authoritarianism has exposed a fundamental truth: loyalty to power often trumps loyalty to principle. "Far-Right Militias Adored the Constitution. Then Came Trump" should serve as both a wake-up call and a rallying cry for all who still believe in the democratic promise of America.
